Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 28 Aug 1999 00:22:47 +0100 (BST) | From | Alex Buell <> | Subject | Re: Oops in 2.2.12 |
| |
On Fri, 27 Aug 1999, Alan Cox wrote:
> I've seen enough reports that I don't trust 2.95 oops errors. I can > well believe they are kernel not compiler caused - ie re-ordering, > register allocation issues etc.
FWIW, I built 2.2.12 with gcc 2.95 and it's been up and running for the last four hours with an load average of 3.4. If it can hold up for the next 24 hours, it should run forever.
Much kudos to all involved.
Cheers, Alex --
Legalise cannabis today!
http://www.tahallah.demon.co.uk
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |