[lkml]   [1999]   [Aug]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Kernels > 1M
    Derek Wildstar wrote:
    > On Sun, 22 Aug 1999, Zack Weinberg wrote:
    > > > > It'd be really great if we could do this, because the zImage, bzImage,
    > > > > etc. nonsense would just disappear and `vmlinux' would be bootable,
    > > > > gzipped or not.
    > > >
    > > > It would suck... because you just invented *yet another* format
    > > > incompatible with all the rest.
    > >
    > > I don't see why a plain ELF executable (possibly gzipped) is yet
    > > another format.
    > Seems booting an uncompressed kernel directly from the FS would be the
    > sensible way to go...especially if this loader manages to get around
    > the 1024-cylinder BIOS limit. Every commercial UNIX i have worked with
    > has done this....I fail to see how we'd be creating an incompatible
    > format? Please elaborate =)
    > -dwild

    Is it compatible with existing boot loaders? No? Then guess what that

    Not to mention it would have to be made to work with initrd, etc; a new
    boot protocol needs to be created entirely. That is not inherently a
    bad idea, but incompatibility is a high price that demands a high


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:53    [W:0.024 / U:9.884 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site