lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Aug]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.2.9+ extreme instability
On Sun, 1 Aug 1999, Matthew Vanecek wrote:

> Don't be so quick to judge the hardware bad. Peter's experiences are
> not isolated. I've had the same problems, and I know others on this
> list have, too. I know my hardware is 100% good, beyond any shadow of a
> doubt. However, I updated knfsd to 1.4.4, and recompiled, and I think I
> changed a couple of options, to. This is 2.2.10. So far, it hasn't
> crashed on me in 20 days of uptime. So Peter, you may try tweaking the
> compile time options, and see if that helps. Just a thought.

On the other hand, I was once like you. I knew my hardware was good. I
mean, I *knew* it. I'd been running Linux on that machine for two years,
all the components had been tested when I bought them, all were quality
(okay, in retrospect, maybe not the Cyrix CPU, but it definitely wasn't
using bargain-basement PNY memory ;-). It started crashing every day.
After I swapped one of the SIMMs out in late June, it hasn't crashed
since....

BTW, Alan, I've been meaning to tell you. If you've put any crash reports
in your database of random unexplained problems from me from June, you can
probably delete 'em as hardware problems....

later,
chris

--
Chris Ricker kaboom@gatech.edu
chris.ricker@genetics.utah.edu


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:53    [W:0.040 / U:0.260 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site