Messages in this thread | | | From | flippie <> | Subject | RE: 2.2.11 and tulip.c issues | Date | Mon, 16 Aug 1999 09:11:09 +0200 |
| |
I agree, the 0.91 driver is much better. I also had problems with 0.89. When starting the machine, the driver gave a lot of errors with 0.89. Running 2.2.7 and uptime of 38 days.
Flippie
On Fri, 13 Aug 1999, Paul Jakma wrote: > > > Do we need to download Donald's 0.91 and test it or what? > > > > Try it - the more data we get (especially Don gets) the better > > Alan > > some data: > > i had a problem with 0.89 where tulip wouldn't (apparently) start (ie no > lights on hub) up after a rmmod/insmod or soft boot. I'd have to power off > the machine to get tulip to work again or else insmod de4x5 which would work > no matter what state tulip had left things in. > > tulip 0.91 doesn't have this problem. it always works. > > nic is an integrated DEC 21143 chip on a Samsung UX motherboard. > > regards, > > paul jakma. > paul@clubi.ie > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- +---------------+-----------------------------------------+ | Flippie Spies | email: flippie@vwv.com | | | http://www.vwv.com | | VWV Studios | "I'm not afraid of dying, I just don't | | South Africa | want to be there when it happens." | +---------------+-----------------------------------------+
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |