Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Thu, 12 Aug 1999 12:43:22 +0200 (CEST) | | From | Andrea Arcangeli <> | | Subject | Re: 2.2.11: Complicated memory leak... |
| |
On Thu, 12 Aug 1999, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>If you do decide to try ikd, and use gcc-2.95 (or ~recent snapshot), >you will need the below incremental patch.
Thanks for the patch. It wasn't needed for us since the caller is implemented in asm, but in general the caller need to know when an extern function is going to remove the parameter from the stack himself.
Which is the exact complain from the compiler? Does it break the compilation complaining about two different declaration of the function?
Andrea
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |