Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 6 Jul 1999 07:07:57 +0200 | From | Jamie Lokier <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] putting old-style lock handling back into 2.2.10 |
| |
david parsons wrote: > No. It's better for the kernel to try to keep the published > interfaces working, so that you don't have to replace user code > when you upgrade kernels.
You'd rather have gdbm silently corrupt your databases due to bad locking? (If that's the case).
-- Jamie
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |