Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: linux headers and C++ | Date | Tue, 6 Jul 1999 22:50:52 +0100 (BST) | From | Alan Cox <> |
| |
> I don't think rewriting the kernel is the issue. Obtaining prototypes of > exported symbols is the main reason people include headers.
In which case you would be using gcc realistically. You need something with the same call sequence, scratch registers, direction flag rules, structure packing and understanding __attribute((packed)) as well as __align to be sure you generate valid code.
> Will you consider accepting header patches for ansification?
It would depend a lot what they did.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |