Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 5 Jul 1999 14:46:05 -0400 (EDT) | From | Joe Hohertz <> | Subject | Re: All this resource-fork AKA multiple stream nonsense |
| |
IIRC, libc was a hack of a hack of a hack of glibc 1, wasn't it?
Given the number of hacks, it was broken. ;) Kudos to those who did make it work tho.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Joe Hohertz - Senior Systems Administrator / \ jhohertz@golden.net http://home.golden.net/~jhohertz /____\ Golden Triangle Online -----[The opinions expressed by me do not necessarily match those of GT]-----
On Mon, 5 Jul 1999, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Joe Hohertz wrote: > > ps: regarding the semantics of filesystems needing innovation, there's an > > old saying that goes 'If it ain't broke, don't fix it.' > > Why did we upgrade to Glibc then? <duck> ;-) > > -- Jamie >
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |