lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jul]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: All this resource-fork AKA multiple stream nonsense

IIRC, libc was a hack of a hack of a hack of glibc 1, wasn't it?

Given the number of hacks, it was broken. ;) Kudos to those who did make
it work tho.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
/\ Joe Hohertz - Senior Systems Administrator
/ \ jhohertz@golden.net http://home.golden.net/~jhohertz
/____\ Golden Triangle Online
-----[The opinions expressed by me do not necessarily match those of GT]-----

On Mon, 5 Jul 1999, Jamie Lokier wrote:

> Joe Hohertz wrote:
> > ps: regarding the semantics of filesystems needing innovation, there's an
> > old saying that goes 'If it ain't broke, don't fix it.'
>
> Why did we upgrade to Glibc then? <duck> ;-)
>
> -- Jamie
>


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:52    [W:0.240 / U:0.232 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site