Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 4 Jul 1999 17:58:47 +0100 (BST) | From | Alex Buell <> | Subject | Re: Patch for 2.2.10 (Quelle surprise!) |
| |
On Sun, 4 Jul 1999, Dominik Kubla wrote:
> Well, while you're at it: it would be nice it uname(1) "-p" would > return the processor type as on Solaris et al. Of course this involves > glibc and sh-utils, not the kernel, but when implementing this feature > you could just keep an eye on what is needed for this to work
'uname -m' returns the processor type. On my machine that gives you 'i686'.
Do you mean uname -p would return 'Intel'? 'AMD' and so on?
> Don't let yourself becoming discouraged by thos procfs proponents: a > lot of people are with you on this on!
I'm still working on it, this is only the beginning. =)
Cheers, Alex --
I hate people who gets offended too easily!
http://www.tahallah.demon.co.uk
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |