Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 4 Jul 1999 18:33:46 +0200 | From | Dominik Kubla <> | Subject | Re: Patch for 2.2.10 (Quelle surprise!) |
| |
On Sun, Jul 04, 1999 at 10:26:24AM +0100, Alex Buell wrote: > > 5) Provide alternative utilities that reads the sysctl stuff. >
Well, while you're at it: it would be nice it uname(1) "-p" would return the processor type as on Solaris et al. Of course this involves glibc and sh-utils, not the kernel, but when implementing this feature you could just keep an eye on what is needed for this to work
Don't let yourself becoming discouraged by thos procfs proponents: a lot of people are with you on this on!
Just my two cents (Yes, we have them in Euro-land too!) Dominik Kubla
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |