Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 29 Jul 1999 21:07:52 +0200 | From | Jamie Lokier <> | Subject | Re: low priority soft RT? |
| |
> Yes, but if you extended your range, you would have "deadlock with > upperbound of minute" situation, which is very bad, also.
What's wrong with simply promoting the SCHED_IDLE task to normal priority while it's in the kernel?
That leaves only user-space deadlocks, e.g. a locked file, which I don't think we should be worring about here.
-- Jamie
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |