lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jul]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: low priority soft RT?
> Yes, but if you extended your range, you would have "deadlock with
> upperbound of minute" situation, which is very bad, also.

What's wrong with simply promoting the SCHED_IDLE task to normal
priority while it's in the kernel?

That leaves only user-space deadlocks, e.g. a locked file, which I don't
think we should be worring about here.

-- Jamie

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:53    [W:0.053 / U:0.636 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site