Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 28 Jul 1999 15:56:46 +0200 | From | Matthew Wilcox <> | Subject | Re: low priority soft RT? |
| |
On Wed, Jul 28, 1999 at 07:09:32AM +1000, Richard Gooch wrote: > Of course, a RT process hitting the > FS is somewhat questionable, but in some cases is legitimate (i.e. you > have two RT processes, the high priority one queues data to the low > priority one which hits the FS), provided you know what you are doing.
Why is the task-which-accesses-disk a RT process instead of a SCHED_OTHER process?
-- Matthew Wilcox <willy@bofh.ai> "Windows and MacOS are products, contrived by engineers in the service of specific companies. Unix, by contrast, is not so much a product as it is a painstakingly compiled oral history of the hacker subculture." - N Stephenson
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |