Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 27 Jul 1999 08:20:34 -0600 | From | yodaiken@chelm ... | Subject | Re: low priority soft RT? |
| |
On Tue, Jul 27, 1999 at 04:04:12PM +0200, Rik van Riel wrote: > On Tue, 27 Jul 1999 yodaiken@chelm.cs.nmt.edu wrote: > > Someone, maybe it was Linus, pointed out that the current range of > > "nice" levels is totally arbitrary and simply increasing the range > > would do good. > > Unfortunately, we showed him he was wrong and the deadlock > could still happen with normal timeslicing processes and > RT tasks...
Can you tell me too?
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |