Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 28 Jul 1999 00:53:19 +0200 | From | Pauline Middelink <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] HZ==100 assumptions |
| |
On Wed, Jul 28, 1999 at 12:05:24AM +0200, Kurt Garloff wrote: > On Tue, Jul 27, 1999 at 05:34:46PM +0200, Jamie Lokier wrote: > > Those drivers have been tested with HZ==100, but probably not with any > > other value. Also if HZ is made very large (e.g. microsecond accuracy) > > "defer as short as possible" is the wrong behaviour. > > > > So IMHO those 1s should all be changed to HZ/100. > > 1 jiffie != 1 s
HZ/100 = 10ms which is a reasonable appr. for a 18.2ms jiffy (ix86)
Met vriendelijke groet, Pauline Middelink -- PGP Key fingerprint = DE 6B D0 D9 19 AD A7 A0 58 A3 06 9D B6 34 39 E2 For more details look at my website http://www.polyware.nl/~middelin
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |