Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 28 Jul 1999 00:05:24 +0200 | From | Kurt Garloff <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] HZ==100 assumptions |
| |
On Tue, Jul 27, 1999 at 05:34:46PM +0200, Jamie Lokier wrote: > Those drivers have been tested with HZ==100, but probably not with any > other value. Also if HZ is made very large (e.g. microsecond accuracy) > "defer as short as possible" is the wrong behaviour. > > So IMHO those 1s should all be changed to HZ/100.
1 jiffie != 1 s
-- Kurt Garloff <garloff@suse.de> SuSE GmbH, Nürnberg, FRG Linux kernel development; SCSI drivers: tmscsim(DC390), DC395 [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |