lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jul]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    Subjectupdate & latencytest
    Date
    Dirk Moerenhout discourseth:
    >
    > Benno never answered my question if he had disabled update when doing the
    > tests on 2.2.8+ kernels. I still fear that this could've been a problem in
    > his setup. The new kflushd works differently then update which sync'd on a
    > which wasn't all that intelligent. Certainly if you run a new kernel with
    > kflushd and at the same time the good old update you are not doing it
    > correct. So I'd really wanna see somebody test it while being sure the old
    > update is not running.

    plain 2.2.10 + update
    4.4ms ( 0)|
    6.1ms ( 42)|
    22.8ms (515)|
    22.5ms (684)|
    9.5ms ( 23)|

    plain 2.2.10 no update
    1.9ms ( 0)|
    6.1ms ( 21)|
    22.8ms (536)|
    22.3ms (666)|
    9.9ms ( 18)|

    Eric

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:53    [W:0.023 / U:0.272 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site