lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jul]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Subjectupdate & latencytest
Date
Dirk Moerenhout discourseth:
>
> Benno never answered my question if he had disabled update when doing the
> tests on 2.2.8+ kernels. I still fear that this could've been a problem in
> his setup. The new kflushd works differently then update which sync'd on a
> which wasn't all that intelligent. Certainly if you run a new kernel with
> kflushd and at the same time the good old update you are not doing it
> correct. So I'd really wanna see somebody test it while being sure the old
> update is not running.

plain 2.2.10 + update
4.4ms ( 0)|
6.1ms ( 42)|
22.8ms (515)|
22.5ms (684)|
9.5ms ( 23)|
plain 2.2.10 no update
1.9ms ( 0)|
6.1ms ( 21)|
22.8ms (536)|
22.3ms (666)|
9.9ms ( 18)|
Eric

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:53    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site