Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: NFS lockd | Date | Mon, 26 Jul 1999 14:23:44 +0200 | From | Olaf Kirch <> |
| |
On Thu, 08 Jul 1999 20:40:01 PDT, H.J. Lu wrote: > > I have a NFS-related question for you: in fs/lockd/clntlock.c::reclaimer() > > we have a very suspiciously-looking place - loop over the active locks > > runs by ->fl_next, not ->fl_nextlink. AFAICS it's a bug, but I'ld like to > > hear your confirmation on that. Comments? > > Cheers, > > I am not familiar with the code. Does anyone have comments?
Yes, he's right. fl_next links all locks for one file; fl_nextlink loops over all locks for all files, which is what we want when we need to reclaim locks.
Olaf -- Olaf Kirch | --- o --- Nous sommes du soleil we love when we play okir@monad.swb.de | / | \ sol.dhoop.naytheet.ah kin.ir.samse.qurax
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |