lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jul]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: NFS lockd
Date
From
On Thu, 08 Jul 1999 20:40:01 PDT, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > I have a NFS-related question for you: in fs/lockd/clntlock.c::reclaimer()
> > we have a very suspiciously-looking place - loop over the active locks
> > runs by ->fl_next, not ->fl_nextlink. AFAICS it's a bug, but I'ld like to
> > hear your confirmation on that. Comments?
> > Cheers,
>
> I am not familiar with the code. Does anyone have comments?

Yes, he's right. fl_next links all locks for one file; fl_nextlink
loops over all locks for all files, which is what we want when we
need to reclaim locks.

Olaf
--
Olaf Kirch | --- o --- Nous sommes du soleil we love when we play
okir@monad.swb.de | / | \ sol.dhoop.naytheet.ah kin.ir.samse.qurax

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:53    [W:0.092 / U:0.048 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site