Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 24 Jul 1999 20:16:53 -0400 (EDT) | From | Alexander Viro <> | Subject | Re: Linux 2.2.11pre2 proposed patch |
| |
On 24 Jul 1999, Nix wrote:
> Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu> writes: > > > On Tue, 20 Jul 1999, Craig Milo Rogers wrote: > > > operations on the filesystem in questions, you might implement an > > > auxiliary file that holds persistent inode mappings. > > > > ... and face additional shitload of races due to the fact that we have an > > extra file to modify. And additional slowdown. Great. > > Nah, it's not that bad, only as bad as umsdos. > > And isn't umsdos lovely, easy to keep running, and a general joy to work > with? Just think, you could do that to normal FAT, too! ;P
<voice tone="Albert"> It's cool - that way we'll outsuck Microsoft! Just imagine what we gonna get on UMSDOS. And it's such an ugly, sick, wonderful feature! Yummm.... *GU-U-U-ULP* </voice> Sorry, couldn't resist... Seriously, it would suck worse than NFS alternative from OSI (if such thing ever existed - *please*, don't share the details, world is already full of suffering).
ObSuckitude: x86 MMU. 'nuff said.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |