lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jul]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: FS corruption... some help maybe??
 <37951911.4859b8-@feist.com> wrote: 
original article:http://www.egroups.com/group/linux-kernel/?start=120211
> Cris Wade wrote:
> > It is not uncommon to see
> > uptimes well in excess of 70 days. I have heard of Linux 1.2.x
> > systems staying up for longer then a year ( and by this time, this
> > might include 2.0.x systems also)
>
> There are many 2.0.x system known to have run over a year before
> reboot. We had a high-use 2.0.36 system run for over 6-months till
the
> power failed for longer than our UPS had reserves. Unfortunately
2.2.x
> still has a ways to go before we see numbers like that- but we still
> have hope.
>
> ron

I have one 2.0.36 machine that made it to 497 days before locking up.
This is a high use web/mail/dns server, running multiple domains. I
think the jiffies counter wrapped and the kernel could not handle that.
And of course it decided to lock when I was out of town, so I could
not look at the screen.

Ed


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:53    [W:0.057 / U:0.432 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site