Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: kernel thread support - LWP's | From | Andi Kleen <> | Date | 18 Jul 1999 09:31:18 +0200 |
| |
drepper@cygnus.com (Ulrich Drepper) writes:
> Tim Hockin <thockin@isunix.it.ilstu.edu> writes: > > > I like it too. I'm doing it right now. Only problem is notifying the > > parent that it had a child without knowing it! (Next on Jerry Springer..) > > While you are at it please also take the appended patch into accound. > It was written by Richard Henderson after my continuous whining about > missing kernel features. It is also needed to correctly start > threads. What it does is introducing a feature available in all other > kernels, namely, creating a thread which is not starting to run > immediately.
Why can't you do that by clone()ing to a trampoline that sends SIGSTOP to itself ?
-Andi
-- This is like TV. I don't like TV.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |