[lkml]   [1999]   [Jul]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] - Some notions that I would like comments on
Chuck Lever wrote:
> > > I mean, is "readaround" for block @ 128k-192k triggered by
> > > reading/paging within block @ 64k-128k, or is it triggered by the first
> > > read with 128k-192k?
> >
> > No, not yet: it's something which we'll probably do eventually.
> > However, on any vaguely modern hardware, the track buffers on the disk
> > itself will keep filling once you've submitted one IO. Accessing the
> > next cluster will take a latency hit on the CPU, but we still get the
> > full disk bandwidth overall.
> why trigger a page-in for the next cluster? doubling the cluster size
> might give the same behavior.

I don't see how it will. Doubling the cluster size just halves the
number of times when we get the latency hit of a synchronous read of the
first page in a cluster.

-- Jamie

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:53    [W:0.047 / U:2.420 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site