Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 16 Jul 1999 18:04:09 -0700 (PDT) | From | Jonathan Walther <> | Subject | Re: New kernel/resource.c |
| |
Linus, can you remind us again why you found it makes more sense to say "PCI" instead of the more generic "bus"? They are both equally easy to type, and one clearly fits all cases. The other is a popular, but not really generic.
Jonathan
On Fri, 16 Jul 1999, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > What's the problem? > I just think that "PCI" makes for a much better name than "peanut", > wouldnt you agree. > I also think it makes for a hell of a better name than > "pci_or_isa_or_pcmcia_or_proprietary_bus_that_uses_io_and_readb". > So instead of using confusing names like "peanut" or "pci_or_isa_or_ > pcmcia_or_who_the_hell_cares_what_electrical_bus_is_outside_the_cpu_ > as_we_cannot_see_it_anyway" , I'm just calling it "PCI". Fair enough? It's > 99% of the interesting market these days.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |