[lkml]   [1999]   [Jul]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [Call For Wartectomy] CRLF conversion out of kernel
Albert D. Cahalan wrote:
> Alexander Viro writes:
> > If somebody has really convincing arguments for preserving the sucker -
> > tell. Otherwise it will die.
> Obvious reason: compatibility.

But if it is/was a mount _option_ then there should be no programs
around that actually don't work without it, should there?
So my vote goes for "kick it out", because if all the programs have to
support it by themselves anyway, why leave it in the kernel?


Marc Mutz <>
University of Bielefeld, Dep. of Mathematics / Dep. of Physics

PGP-keyID's: 0xd46ce9ab (RSA), 0x7ae55b9e (DSS/DH)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:52    [W:0.036 / U:7.548 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site