lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jun]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: Migrating to larger numbers
    Date
    In article <linux.kernel.7IYJSCT1w-B@khms.westfalen.de>,
    Kai Henningsen <kaih@khms.westfalen.de> wrote:
    [time_t and C; library or creeping Pascal?]

    >The above scenario *might* be a conformant freestanding implementation -
    >that is, one with minimal library support (float.h, limits.h, stdarg.h,
    >and stddef.h, only). It *cannot* be a conformant hosted implementation,
    >because it doesn't conform to 4.12.1.

    Cool, so ISO C was designed by Pascal hackers.

    That's pretty icky.

    ____
    david parsons \bi/ ObKernel: none that I can think of.
    \/

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:52    [W:0.019 / U:1.020 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site