[lkml]   [1999]   [Jun]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Migrating to larger numbers
> > I wonder if it might be possible to do something special for NFS, like
> > maybe make for NFS consumption a special file system where specific 64
> > bit device numbers are mapped into a 32 bit range... [And didn't I
> > already see some posts about device number aliasing?]
> Nobody else has needed more than 32bits. Show me a case it is needed and
> an OS that suffers from using 32bits. Then you can argue about ruining NFS
> interoperability for the sake of some airy number guessing.

On a side note, what happens if say 32bits were implemented (as it's
currently IIRC 16 bit. 8bit major 8bit minor) as 12bit:20bit and you have
an older nfs client (say about .2 or .4 kernel versions prior. I'm talking
minor kernel version, not patch) looking in /dev on the server? I use on
occasion, /dev/dsp off a server (this is the way I have a game setup that
runs entirely over nfs)

What would happen, would the nfs server realize it has an old client and
mask the major/minor?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:52    [W:0.064 / U:5.504 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site