[lkml]   [1999]   [Jun]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Migrating to larger numbers
    > 4096 is the part that worries me, it doesn't seem like an unreasonable
    > number. Basically, I'm worried that with 32 bits we'll end up with a
    > split that will be problematic on both ends for some device.

    There are a lot of devices that can be multiplexed. With a million minor
    numbers you can sanely do things like "industrial controllers all live
    on major 395". We also get back the 7 majors for each block subsystem
    we dont need any more

    And we do need to reclaim a few of the bogus majors issued now for things
    that should be using generic APIs or misc devices.

    > Then we can hope that NFS v2 (v3 as well?) are dead or dying when this
    > becomes a problem.

    I'd give NFSv2 another 30 years. I believe NFSv4 draft is also 32bit


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:52    [W:0.022 / U:75.136 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site