[lkml]   [1999]   [Jun]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: zero-copy TCP fileserving
       Date: 	Mon, 7 Jun 1999 15:45:03 +0100 (BST)
    From: Alan Cox <>

    You might want to benchmark the overhead of that. You have to
    invalidate and be sure the other cpu invalidation is complete
    before continuing. I don't doubt it can be way faster than intel,
    but I doubt its that cheap.

    Anyone have datasheet figures ?

    Sure you can, if things are setup correctly, the CPU does the
    invalidation at the first event at which it can take any trap, for
    example on UltraSparc.

    All the information needed to perform the flush is in the IRQ packet
    itself, so it's atomic etc. As soon as you get a non-NAK from the cpu
    on the sender side, you can act as if the flush arrived.

    My point is that on some machines it is quite cheap to "be sure".

    I have not overlooked the fact that avoiding the cross TLB flush is
    important, because in fact even on UltraSparc I take great pains to
    make sure it almost never happens.

    David S. Miller

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:52    [W:0.019 / U:69.356 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site