lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jun]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.2.x instabilities
hi-

Gee, it must be getting late there...

Alan Cox wrote:

> Though if you want maximum stability you should not be running a
> -ac patch.

Agreed, understood, and accepted. Your ac-patches often have tweaks
for the problems we're seeing, so they are eagerly and thankfully
received whenever posted.

> If people report bugs and expect rapid fixes to every bug they've
> forgotten <to> pick a vendor of their choice and buy a support
> contract.

very true, I hope I don't make such an unrealistic impression.

> Silence is also not "nothing occuring", often its combinations of
> reports that resolve a bug. One cases of "my computer crashed doing
> XYZ" may not help but 5 of them all with the same hardware do

right. I often work with customer support, so I understand the
process. Unfortunately the folks I deal with aren't as knowledgeable as
this crowd...

ron

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:52    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site