[lkml]   [1999]   [Jun]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: zero-copy TCP fileserving
Alan Cox wrote:

> > Why do several prominent firewall and networking companies shun or speak foul of our
> > networking, saying we drop so many packets under load that linux simply isn't an
> > acceptable platform for their product? This is most recently in reference to
> You mean one single vendor whose monitoring product is optimised for BPF
> and who hasnt considered writing a BPF module for Linux moans a lot.

yep, and the other bandwagon jumpers.

> Yeah SOCK_PACKET sucks in relative terms for high speed capture of packets.
> As to firewalls/routing 2.2 is fast. If we can get fastroute caching firewall
> rules in 2.3.x we'll really kick butt.

most excellent. i love driving the baddest OS on the block.

btw, is there a whitepaper or simile that weighs the merits of skbuff and mbuff against
each other? i'd like to have artillery at hand to defend when assailed by bsd zealots.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:52    [W:0.039 / U:3.104 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site