[lkml]   [1999]   [Jun]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: albods are not a clean set of orthogonal primitives (was Re: File systems are semantically impoverished compared to database and keyword systems: it is time to change!)

On Fri, 25 Jun 1999, Alexander Viro wrote:
> How permanent is the association of such regular component with directory?
> Can you rename it away? Can you remove it? What happens if you do so? Can
> you create links to such animals? Where do they belong in that case? In
> other words, are they 1st-class objects or not? If we are losing almost
> all filesystem operations on such animals - what's the point of doing them
> in fs?
> Another thing being: do you want to have them as files in directory or
> as small tree in file? IOW, is it namespace issue (first variant) or a
> fast equivalent of mounting via loopback device + namespace tricks?

I really think the thing should be something like just


Remember: it would be implemented as if it was an implied symlink, so you
can move them around and do whatever to them, it's just that there would
bea shorthand for opening a special name under the directory.

And it is ONLY a shorthand. Nothing more.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:52    [W:0.135 / U:10.828 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site