[lkml]   [1999]   [Jun]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: (reiserfs) Re: I discussed reading directories as files with jra, Stallman, and
    On Tue, Jun 22, 1999 at 03:35:50PM -0700, Bill Huey wrote:
    > > One of the reasons why the Apple resource-fork was a really sucky idea
    > > in practice was that executables stored dialog boxes, buttons, text, all
    > > in resources --- which would get lost if you tried to ftp the file
    > > unless you binhexed or otherwise prepped the file for transfer first.
    > Oh, you're brain-dead shut the hell up...
    > Macintosh resource forks are somethat you you either "get" or don't "get".

    You can "get" something without agreeing with it.

    > Coming from a Macintosh background and working with Macintosh OS internals,
    > I can't imagine that OSes live without and additional stream per file.

    Not only are you offensive, but you're wrong.

    In practise the difference to the user between systems with streamed files
    and one like UNIX without streamed files is zero. The unstreamed system is
    simply required to use a filename per fork, and operations that modify any
    file must modify all forks appropriately.

    This is harder if you're trying to preserve backwards compatiblity with an
    army of programs which don't understand forks, but is trivial for a system
    being designed from the "groundup" to be only accessed through a graphical
    file manager. All GUI applications just need take care.

    It doesn't even make the job any harder for the programmer. They just need
    to use forked variants of common filesystem operations ie. frkopen().

    Now you can argue that forked filesystems have other benefits (speed, code
    size, simplicity) but the fundamental benefit is achievable on filesystems
    without streamed files. Even things like locking and atomic operations are
    not a hinderance with "faked" streamed files.

    > The BeOS does some pretty outstanding stuff with file attributes and
    > like. OpenStep hack this stuff in using directories, but it still was
    > pretty effective since I was designed correctly.

    It's not a hack. It's just putting the code in userspace, not the kernel.

    > [horribly offensive content deleted]

    Is this really necessary?

    Nathan Hand - Chirp Web Design - - $e^{i\pi}+1 = 0$
    Phone: +61 2 6230 1871 Fax: +61 2 6230 4455 E-mail:

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:52    [W:0.020 / U:347.796 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site