lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jun]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: version.h in 2.2.10
According to Otel Florian-Daniel:
> > I want
> > -I/usr/src/linux-2.2.10/include --exclude /usr/src/linux-2.2.10/include/net ;)
>
> That's _exactly_ why you need the _real_ kernel headers and not what
> glibc _thinks_ are kernel headers. I just had this argument today w/
> some Debian people (Debian has /usr/include/linux as glibc stuff and
> i'm on a RH having /usr/include/linux pointing in the kernel source ---
> IMHO _rightfully_).

Look, we've been over this before. This is not the _real_, but the _only_
reason why you would need to have matching kernel headers. And it's
easily fixable.

But this doesn't belong on linux-kernel, I think. Unless someone could
comment on the feasibility of moving /usr/src/linux/include/net to
/usr/src/linux/include/linux/net, which _is_ on-topic and would solve
the problem of compiling with -I/usr/src/linux/include quite nicely.

Mike.
--
Make bzImage, not win.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:52    [W:0.039 / U:0.196 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site