Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 22 Jun 1999 00:02:20 +0200 | From | Miquel van Smoorenburg <> | Subject | Re: version.h in 2.2.10 |
| |
According to Otel Florian-Daniel: > > I want > > -I/usr/src/linux-2.2.10/include --exclude /usr/src/linux-2.2.10/include/net ;) > > That's _exactly_ why you need the _real_ kernel headers and not what > glibc _thinks_ are kernel headers. I just had this argument today w/ > some Debian people (Debian has /usr/include/linux as glibc stuff and > i'm on a RH having /usr/include/linux pointing in the kernel source --- > IMHO _rightfully_).
Look, we've been over this before. This is not the _real_, but the _only_ reason why you would need to have matching kernel headers. And it's easily fixable.
But this doesn't belong on linux-kernel, I think. Unless someone could comment on the feasibility of moving /usr/src/linux/include/net to /usr/src/linux/include/linux/net, which _is_ on-topic and would solve the problem of compiling with -I/usr/src/linux/include quite nicely.
Mike. -- Make bzImage, not win.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |