lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jun]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Why khttpd is a bad idea (was a pointless argument about
* Philip Blundell said:
> >You wouldn't need them if the server is in the kernel. At the very least,
> >there wouldn't be any need for wrapping the kernel calls with user-space
> >functions - again, conservation of space and time.
>
> If the handful of bytes it takes to wrap a syscall is a serious concern for
> you then Linux is probably not the right platform for your application.
Hmm... I was talking about an embedded system where every byte is precious,
and every CPU clock saved on context switching is a win.

marek
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:52    [W:0.311 / U:0.904 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site