Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 18 Jun 1999 14:06:42 +0200 (CEST) | From | Rik van Riel <> | Subject | Re: Why khttpd is a bad idea (was a pointless argument about devfs) |
| |
On Fri, 18 Jun 1999, Alan Cox wrote:
> BTW: the big issue with khttpd is a lack of genericness. Its a single > problem single solution piece of code. There are lots and lots of > equivalent problems and they all boil own to the same thing.
Not that I completely disagree with you, but I'm just curious if you think the same way about knfsd...
Rik -- Open Source: you deserve to be in control of your data. +-------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Le Reseau netwerksystemen BV: http://www.reseau.nl/ | | Linux Memory Management site: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/ | | Nederlandse Linux documentatie: http://www.nl.linux.org/ | +-------------------------------------------------------------------+
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |