Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: More general resource allocation scheme: comments?? | Date | Thu, 17 Jun 1999 13:31:01 +0100 (BST) | From | Alan Cox <> |
| |
> Use the existing resource table for IO ports, only have a new special > kind of entry with name=NULL, which means "occupied". If a driver
Basically split claim and use. Yes
> Does this seem like a reasonable way to proceed? I like it because it > doesn't introduce any API discontinuities. Should I go ahead and > implement it?
It seems to do what I need. Remember to add main memory to the memory resource table 8)
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |