lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jun]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: More general resource allocation scheme: comments??
Date
From
> Use the existing resource table for IO ports, only have a new special
> kind of entry with name=NULL, which means "occupied". If a driver


Basically split claim and use. Yes

> Does this seem like a reasonable way to proceed? I like it because it
> doesn't introduce any API discontinuities. Should I go ahead and
> implement it?

It seems to do what I need. Remember to add main memory to the memory resource
table 8)


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:52    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site