lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jun]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: More general resource allocation scheme: comments??
    Date
    From
    > Use the existing resource table for IO ports, only have a new special
    > kind of entry with name=NULL, which means "occupied". If a driver


    Basically split claim and use. Yes

    > Does this seem like a reasonable way to proceed? I like it because it
    > doesn't introduce any API discontinuities. Should I go ahead and
    > implement it?

    It seems to do what I need. Remember to add main memory to the memory resource
    table 8)


    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:52    [W:0.020 / U:1.444 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site