Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 14 Jun 1999 22:06:54 +0200 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: Speeding up fsck 2 times |
| |
Hi!
> > I do not know if I should attempt official kernel integration. I > > probably can make it per mount option pretty easily. > > If you can show with actual benchmarks how much slower is the worst case, > and if the slow down isn't too bad (or is inexistant), then it should > definitely be integrated. > We just have to come up with the worst case and a benchmark for it so we > can try it on various configs. Is linear access to a big > file the worst case ? Isn't there something worse ?
mj thinks random access is the real worst case. No, I did not do the benchmarks. Too much memory and not enough unpartitioned hdd space, here ;-).
Pavel -- I'm really pavel@ucw.cz. Look at http://195.113.31.123/~pavel. Pavel Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please!
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |