lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jun]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Speeding up fsck 2 times
Hi!

> > I do not know if I should attempt official kernel integration. I
> > probably can make it per mount option pretty easily.
>
> If you can show with actual benchmarks how much slower is the worst case,
> and if the slow down isn't too bad (or is inexistant), then it should
> definitely be integrated.
> We just have to come up with the worst case and a benchmark for it so we
> can try it on various configs. Is linear access to a big
> file the worst case ? Isn't there something worse ?

mj thinks random access is the real worst case. No, I did not do the
benchmarks. Too much memory and not enough unpartitioned hdd space,
here ;-).

Pavel
--
I'm really pavel@ucw.cz. Look at http://195.113.31.123/~pavel. Pavel
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please!

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:52    [W:0.309 / U:0.008 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site