Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 14 Jun 1999 14:22:07 +0100 (MET) | From | DAVID BALAZIC <> | Subject | Re: Partition nightmare Was: Migrating to larger numbers |
| |
Marc Lehmann (pcg@goof.com) wrote :
> On Fri, Jun 11, 1999 at 10:55:13AM +0100, DAVID BALAZIC wrote: > > > in fstab. I tried it, and mount likes the labels just fine. However, my > > > fsck doesn't understand the labels yet (didn't try the UUIDs). > > > > The difference is that Volume-label and UUID are stored in the partition, which > > means they can't used with mkfs and neither with fsck , because the partition > > This does not at all mean they can't be used!
OK , then how would you make this : "mke2fs on partition YAHOO1" if the label YAHOO1 isn't defined anywhere ?
Off course "mke2fs /dev/hdx --set-label=YAHOO1" is possible , but then you are NOT using labels to select a partition.
It is true that making a file system is a one time operation and the admin "has time" to look up the correct partition , but just using labels is easier , IMHO.
> > may be currupt. > > If the partition is so corrupt that the label name can't be found > user interaction is probably necessary anyway. If the label is intact > everything is fine.
But if it isn't , then it's not fine. If the FS is corrupted , then any part of it can be bad , including the label , don't you think so ?
-- David Balazic , student E-mail : 1stein@writeme.com | living in sLOVEnija home page: http://surf.to/stein Computer: Amiga 1200 + Quantum LPS-340AT --
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |