[lkml]   [1999]   [Jun]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: cachefs module for linux?

    > > No. AFAIK coda server is unable to export existing tree. Coda likes
    > > to do filesystem itself.
    > Is this inherent in the design, or could it be worked around?

    Probably could be worked around, I'm not a coda developer.

    > I'd certainly be more inclined to use coda if I could gradually introduce
    > (test) it without having to convert my existing data partitions.

    I'd like that feature, too.

    > Is it possible to set up a coda server which serves existing 'real'
    > filesystems? An extension to podfuk, perhaps? Or should we start on
    > kcodad?

    Well, with podfuk any ftp server is good enough for you. Just cd
    /#ftp:.../ to it ;-).

    > What were the original reasons for using its own filesystem? Does it require
    > metadata/functionality that POSIX filesystems don't provide?

    Unknown. Look at for more information.

    I'm really Look at Pavel
    Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please!

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:52    [W:0.022 / U:45.784 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site