lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [May]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: performance & you-know-who
On Sun, 9 May 1999, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:

> If the benchmark imply VM and I/O load, my tree will give a big boost (as
> _worse_ a 10% improvement) and it's rock solid (I doesn't work by luck).
>
> I also have a patch against pre-2.2.8-4 but I want to finish fixing the
> new scheduler in the pre-patches before releasing it (I plan to finish
> tomorrow).

What changes are you making to the scheduler? From all the testing I've
done, the changes Ingo made seem to be working very well now.

Simon-

| Simon Kirby | Systems Administration |
| mailto:sim@netnation.com | NetNation Communications |
| http://www.netnation.com/ | Tech: (604) 684-6892 |


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:51    [W:0.713 / U:0.224 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site