lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [May]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Status of Linux SCSI generic implementation
Kurt Garloff wrote:

> On Wed, May 05, 1999 at 11:07:20AM +1200, Max wrote:
> > what is the current status of this and what are the plans for the
> > future? Apparently there is a lot of hurt feelings on the side of the
> > creator of the famous cdrecord program...
>
> According to me, Jörg has some good points, and we should carefully read
> his discussion.
> IMHO, sg should be redesigned to make it better suitable for cdrecord and
> sane (the two main applications). I'm afraid, that in 2.2 not much can be
> done, because we don't want to change the interfaces.
>
> I don't know the sane authors, but I'd like to talk to them and to Jörg,
> when making the 2.3 sg driver. I would really enjoy, if they would help to
> design (and implement) an enhanced sg driver.
>
> The midlevel SCSI code needs reworking too, but his is definitely a 2.3
> project. High-Level is OK, apart from sg, acc. to me.
>
> Regards,
> --
> Kurt Garloff <garloff@suse.de> SuSE GmbH, Nürnberg, FRG
> Linux kernel development; SCSI driver: DC390 (tmscsim/AM53C974)
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>

Forgive me if this has been addressed in the past.

Is there any chance of getting a SCSI-2 CAM (Common Access Method) interface?

Is there already one?


--

Joshua A. Johnson


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:51    [W:1.540 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site