Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 31 May 1999 16:23:42 -0700 | From | "H. Peter Anvin" <> | Subject | Re: I2O status and Linux? |
| |
Alan Cox wrote: > > > I2O has been opened up and Alan Cox is working on it. Note, however, > > that although Intel likes to push it (it means *another* Intel chip in > > each machine!) the adoption rate is really quite low. > > It doesnt have to be intel. There are people using PPC and ARM (non SA arm) > > There are lots of reasons its only just beginning to move - one of which is > people waiting for NT5
That is true, but Intel certainly are *hoping* they'll use i960 or StrongARM, and that seems to be the majority of I2O implementations. I don't blame them, by the way... if I were them, I'd be pushing it, too :)
-- "The user's computer downloads the ActiveX code and simulates a 'Blue Screen' crash, a generally benign event most users are familiar with and that would not necessarily arouse suspicions." -- Security exploit description on http://www.zks.net/p3/how.asp
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |