Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 28 May 1999 23:02:33 -0400 (EDT) | From | "Steven N. Hirsch" <> | Subject | Re: Bad NFS performance with client 2.2.9 |
| |
On Wed, 26 May 1999, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> BTW: against our own server with the linux-2.2.9 + the knfsd-1.3.2 + > NFSv3 client patches, I'm now seeing the following results (never been > better): > > IOZONE: Performance Test of Sequential File I/O -- V2.01 (10/21/94) > By Bill Norcott > > Operating System: POSIX 1003.1-1990 > > Send comments to: b_norcott@xway.com > > IOZONE writes a 120 Megabyte sequential file consisting of > 15360 records which are each 8192 bytes in length. > It then reads the file. It prints the bytes-per-second > rate at which the computer can read and write files. > > > Writing the 120 Megabyte file, 'zz'...13.900000 seconds > Reading the file...14.120000 seconds > > IOZONE performance measurements: > 9052454 bytes/second for writing the file > 8911410 bytes/second for reading the file
That's really smoking! Is this using the NFS v3 protocol? I am lucky to see half that between my boxes (over 100Base ethernet).
I had tried NFS v3 at one point, but started seeing some scary messages in the logs and chickened out <g>.
Steve
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |