lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [May]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Where's the patch to 2.2.0?
On Mon, May 24, 1999 at 04:24:54AM +0200, StarFire wrote:
> Riley Williams schrieb:
> > > this might be discusse already, but why is there no
> > > patch-2.2.0-pre9-to-2.2.0 (or something like that)??
> > > My guess that '2.2.0-final' is '2.2.0' was obviously wrong.
> >
> > Why is it 'obviously wrong' then?
> >
> > Q> 23248 Tue Jan 26 01:41:00 1999 patch-2.2.0-final.bz2
> > Q> 10592549 Tue Jan 26 01:41:00 1999 linux-2.2.0.tar.bz2
> >
> > Curious that the patch you declare to be wrong and the 2.2.0
> > kernel tarball have identical timestamps if they're for different
> > kernels...
> >
> Hi!
> So, have you tried to apply the 'patch-2.2.1' to a
> 'patch-2.2.0-pre9'-patched kernel tree (The Makefile says '-final')?
> It produces lots of rejects. And the diff -urN between
> 'linux-2.2.0-pre9' and 'linux-2.2.0' I had to produce by myself
> (which I expected to find as 'patch-2.2.0-pre9-to-2.2.0')
> is not small, 23315 bytes in it's .bz2 version.
>
> And I have never seen a 'patch-2.2.0-final.bz2' !
> ^^^^^

it's in the v2.1 directory. 2.2.0-final needs to be applied to 2.2.0-pre9.
2.2.1 applies to 2.2.0-final (which doesn't have an EXTRAVERSION of -final)

-- arvind

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:51    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site