lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [May]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Capabilities done right [diff against 2.3.1]
Hi!

> > And anything that requires me to compile anything as a MIS person is
> > basically not acceptable. Remember what =users= are? They are the kind of
> > people that want to use the system, and not care about the technical
> > issues.
>
> I'll say an amen to that as an administrator - I'd feel a large portion of
> the ostensible benefits of capabilities had been lost if I have to compile an
> ELF binary anytime I want to modify a program's capabilities.

If you took a look at followups and/or documentation which came with
patch, you'd know that it is well possible to set capabilities without
recompile. Read http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/elfcap.html.

Pavel
--
I'm really pavel@ucw.cz. Look at http://195.113.31.123/~pavel. Pavel
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread!

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:51    [W:5.639 / U:0.908 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site