lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [May]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: most stable 2.2.x kernel?
    On Sat, 15 May 1999, Simon Kirby wrote:

    > On Fri, 14 May 1999, Brian wrote:
    >
    > > What is the most stable 2.2.x kernel out their for production use? I
    > > moved from 2.0.35 to 2.2.8 and had major crashes on about half dozen
    > > systems. I backed down to 2.2.7-ac4 (I wanted the >1024 descriptors), and
    > > had one crash so far.
    >
    > Attached is a simple patch against 2.2.9 made from fdset-2.2.3.diff that
    > should work on x86 (I think I remember that other platforms rejected hunks
    > and I can't recall if I fixed them or not). This should get you on your
    > way with 2.2.9, which fixes most things (most importantly reverting the
    > mass buffer code that was causing problems and avoiding the tcp div by
    > zero that disabled net_bh :)).
    >
    > Simon-

    Thanks simon. Do you have any knowledge of if/when the fdset features
    will be merged with 2.2.x natural?

    Brian


    >
    > | Simon Kirby | Systems Administration |
    > | mailto:sim@netnation.com | NetNation Communications |
    > | http://www.netnation.com/ | Tech: (604) 684-6892 |
    >

    -----------------------------------------------------
    Brian Feeny (BF304) signal@shreve.net
    318-222-2638 x 109 http://www.shreve.net/~signal
    Network Administrator ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881)


    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:51    [W:0.060 / U:31.868 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site