lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [May]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Slashdot shitheads
alex@eos.co.uk wrote:

> Why was the release of 2.3.0 kernel announced on slashdot? Now we'll get
> clueless fuckwits installing broken 2.3.x kernels and complaining loudly
> that it sucks simply because they don't realise it is a DEVELOPMENT
> kernel!

There will always be such people around.

>
> The press release on slashdot made no distinction between the 2.2.x and
> 2.3.x kernels, unfortunately.
>
> How about we break 2.3.1 (intrdouce some serious disk corruption) to teach
> them the errors of their ways!

I can't believe I'm seeing this on linux-kernel!! This is very juvenile way
of reacting and I'm seriously concerned. If some of the people developing
Linux are stupid enough to react like this then what about their code?

I would expect this from Microsoft, but not here. If it's so bad then just
tell them for Christ's sake! You don't hit them on their heads!

/Per Erik Stendahl

ps. Sorry for the outburst but this really upset me.
Replies/flames to me personally only please.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:51    [W:0.998 / U:0.056 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site