[lkml]   [1999]   [Apr]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch] arca-vm-2.2.5

On Wed, 7 Apr 1999 00:27:21 +0200 (CEST), Andrea Arcangeli
<> said:

> It's not so obvious to me. I sure agree that an O(n) insertion/deletion is
> far too slow but a O(log(n)) for everything could be rasonable to me. And
> trees don't worry about unluky hash behavior.

Trees are O(log n) for insert/delete, with a high constant of
proportionality (ie. there can be quite a lot of work to be done even
for small log n). Trees also occupy more memory per node. Hashes are
O(1) for insert and delete, and are a _fast_ O(1). The page cache needs
fast insert and delete.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:51    [W:0.083 / U:2.452 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site