lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Apr]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: GNU/Linux stance by Richard Stallman
In <199904061235.OAA20328@wsdw01.win.tue.nl> Guest section DW (dwguest@win.tue.nl) wrote:
GD> From: "Khimenko Victor" <khim@sch57.msk.ru>

GD> RW> As has been stated several times, the comments regarding number of
GD> RW> arguments are irrelevant, as the POSIX standard explicitly allows
GD> RW> them.

GD> Where ?

GD> POSIX.2, 2.11.3:
GD> Options: When this subclause is listed as `None' it means that the
GD> implementation need not support any options.

GD> POSIX.2, 2.11.4:
GD> Operands: When this subclause is listed as `None' it means that the
GD> implementation need not support any operands.

May be it's just my poor english but "need not" and "CAN NOT" are different
things ...




-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:51    [W:0.040 / U:0.132 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site