Messages in this thread | | | From | "Khimenko Victor" <> | Date | Tue, 6 Apr 1999 17:22:48 +0400 (MSD) | Subject | Re: GNU/Linux stance by Richard Stallman |
| |
In <199904061235.OAA20328@wsdw01.win.tue.nl> Guest section DW (dwguest@win.tue.nl) wrote: GD> From: "Khimenko Victor" <khim@sch57.msk.ru>
GD> RW> As has been stated several times, the comments regarding number of GD> RW> arguments are irrelevant, as the POSIX standard explicitly allows GD> RW> them.
GD> Where ?
GD> POSIX.2, 2.11.3: GD> Options: When this subclause is listed as `None' it means that the GD> implementation need not support any options.
GD> POSIX.2, 2.11.4: GD> Operands: When this subclause is listed as `None' it means that the GD> implementation need not support any operands.
May be it's just my poor english but "need not" and "CAN NOT" are different things ...
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |