lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Apr]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch] some buffer.c glitches
On Mon, 5 Apr 1999, Chuck Lever wrote:

>i'm thinking that would be hard to implement efficiently. set_blocksize()

set_blocksize don't need performances at all, but the race I seen is
really bad and needs fixage (I am not too much worried about it thought
because I don't use removable media frequently).

>same as touch_buffer() comment above -- agreed. naked find_buffer() is
>used in lots of places from ext2 and the raid code, isn't it?

Yes.

Andrea Arcangeli


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:51    [W:0.060 / U:0.216 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site