Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 6 Apr 1999 15:06:59 +0200 (CEST) | From | Andrea Arcangeli <> | Subject | Re: [patch] some buffer.c glitches |
| |
On Mon, 5 Apr 1999, Chuck Lever wrote:
>i'm thinking that would be hard to implement efficiently. set_blocksize()
set_blocksize don't need performances at all, but the race I seen is really bad and needs fixage (I am not too much worried about it thought because I don't use removable media frequently).
>same as touch_buffer() comment above -- agreed. naked find_buffer() is >used in lots of places from ext2 and the raid code, isn't it?
Yes.
Andrea Arcangeli
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |