Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 23 Apr 1999 06:36:04 -0400 (EDT) | From | Alexander Viro <> | Subject | Re: [replace-alexv-buffer.c-patch] Re: [PATCH] Several bad bugs in fs/* |
| |
> Ooops! I can see why md.c and raid[15].c may want to set BH_Lock > bit in irregular way, but WTF is so special about ide-tape.c that it > wants to do it?
Ta-da... I've just realized what will happen if we'll do losetup /dev/loop0 foo mount -t ext2 /dev/loop /mnt/1 losetup /dev/loop1 /mnt/1/bar mount -t /dev/loop1 /mnt/2 Besides, you don't really need loop-over-loop to get this effect - do_lo_request() calls bmap() which may generate more than 1 buffer head and more than 1 request... Comments?
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |